Gerbera daisies are bright and bold, not delicate and frail. I have a couple of plants that have been growing in a patio pot for several years now, and they bloom for most of the year. They rarely fail to make me smile. Tags: flowers, Gerbera daisy, photos
I planted a variety pack's worth, which is currently blooming in red, purple and white with a colored center. So cheerful! ETA: dern Blogger - it posted the old version of the post. This is what it's supposed to look like - with photos. Tags: flowers, photos, phlox
At the most recent Republican "debate" the candidates were asked to "raise their hands if they did not believe in evolution." Three raised their hands: Senator Sam Brownback, Governor Mike Huckabee, and Representative Tom Tancredo. (read the transcript) Now, generally, this was a good result. The front runners - Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, and Mitt Romney* - didn't raise their hands, and three of the candidates willingly declared themselves unfit for office. Why do I say unfit? It's not because they are religious, but because that anyone who rejects the more than 200 years of scientific research** out of hand simply should not be involved in making policy decisions. The leader of the U.S. should not pick and choose which facts to believe. The people of Kansas, Arkansas, and Colorado may be willing to have such willfully ignorant politicians represent them, but they have no place representing anyone who considers themselves part of the "reality based community" (such as me).
The question itself has been bothering me a bit though. I couldn't really put my finger on it until I read this essay by Henry Schreiber. He describes his experience teaching evolution in heavily creationist east Texas, and, in particular, his gut reaction to one student who came to him to tell him that she now "believed" in evolution:
“Believing in evolution” is an abominable non-sequitur. It reveals that the speaker doesn’t grasp the most fundamental aspect of science. Beliefs have to do with faith, and faith has to do with religious things, unseen but believed. In contrast, science is about constructing models of the natural world without recourse to anything unseen or supernatural. Believing and evolution do not go together in the same sentence. Evolution is not a metaphysical or religious truth in which one professes faith; it is just the representation that best fits and explains what is presently known about the natural world.
I want a President that will at least try to understand global warming and stem cell research and toxins in the environment. Is that so much to ask for? Will the media step up and actually start asking the hard questions? I hope so.
*** The Republicans have been in power for the past 8 years, so they've had the best opportunity to muck with science. The Democrats running for President shouldn't be exempt from answering questions on science issues too. Obama has said "Evolution is more grounded in my experience than angels." That sounds like a good start.
This week's flower photos are from a dwarf meyer lemon that I've had growing in a half barrel for several years. They were taken about three weeks ago, when the blooms were at their peak - and they smelled lovely.
I've been playing with the macro feature of my camera. It's amazing the details that the closeups show. Just for fun, I plan to post a flower a week: This week's flower is the orchid rockrose, Cistus purpureus. The rockrose is a hearty shrub that survived the freezing temperatures we had that we had in December and January, and had no problem with the 100+ days of July and August. It has been blooming heartily since the end of March. Even after it's done flowering, it's a handsome shrub, with sage-like leaves.
Note: I reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive or appear to be spam.
To search this blog, use the little box in the upper left corner. Or were you looking for Robert Frost's poem The Road Not Taken?